“BEING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF GOD”
I cannot remember precisely where I
was when I began to think about you, when my mind settled upon a consideration
of not only your spiritual condition and welfare but also the spiritual
condition and welfare of that person who most influences you. Then I was
troubled with the thought. Are you sure it is wise for you to allow that person
to influence you as much as he or she does? Think about it for a moment. Is it
really so wise that you adopt without serious reflection on the matter your
father’s attitude toward reading, your father’s attitude toward study, your
father’s attitude toward providing for the future, or your father’s attitude
toward the things of God and matters of eternity? I ask this question because
my own father was either indifferent or hostile to spiritual matters for the
first sixty years of his life.
For an individual, be he a young man
or be she a young woman, to succeed in life where his father failed or where
her mother failed, that individual must at some point make a conscious decision
to not follow the example of his or her dad or mom and be
different. My father was the son of a very poor sharecropper and his wife who
had very limited educations, no marketable skills of any kind, and no prospects
for the future. For some reason my father chose to read rather than follow the
example of his father, and he did so without in any way dishonoring his father.
My aunt Ruth, dad’s older sister, taught him to read when he was four or five
years old. Over the course of his childhood he was actually discouraged from
reading by his parents, oftentimes missing meals while engrossed in a book
because his parents refused to call him a second time when supper was being
served to their very large family. Yet had my dad not chosen to go a different
way than his father he, too, would have ended up trapped in a vicious cycle of
ignorance and poverty. My father’s decision, his conscious decision, to learn
how to read and to become a diligent and committed reader resulted in
opportunities that he could and did take advantage of that others in the same
predicament did not take advantage of, either because they did not see those
opportunities or if they saw them could not take advantage of them. That is how
my dad became the first in his family to obtain a college education, to secure
a white collar career, and to thereby so alter the course of his life and
guarantee that he would never face the grinding poverty that he
grew up in. Was my dad wrong for doing what he did? Was he in any way disloyal
to his dad? Did he at any time dishonor his father because he made a choice to
not follow his dad’s example and preferences in life? No, he did not.
Having spent a few moments on the
benefit to my father (and also to me) of him not blindly following the example
of his father, let me now rehearse to you the benefit of me in similar fashion
not following the example of my father. Of course, I did follow my father’s
example when it came to reading and becoming an avid reader. That is an example
that any child should emulate. As well, I followed my father’s example with
respect to obtaining an education. There are different kinds of education and
training, so that one size or one kind is not necessarily suitable for
everyone. That said, making your way in this life is always easier when you
have training of some kind than when you have training of no kind, when you are
educated in some way rather than being educated in no way. Where I did not
follow my father’s example was with respect to spiritual matters. Why not? Because
my father was throughout most of his life utterly dismissive of spiritual
concerns. I submit to you that if your father, or your mother, or some other
important and influential person in your life is either obviously wrong about
spiritual matters or is completely dismissive of spiritual matters then it is
your responsibility before God to choose to limit that person’s influence on
your life so that you do not treat in cavalier fashion what is quite simply the
most important concern of anyone’s life; eternity. It is far better to honor
God by obeying the gospel than it is to follow the example of some influential
person and erroneously honor him while you both dishonor God, even if that
influential person happens to be your own mother or father.
Someone, anyone, who has not been
reconciled to God through faith in Jesus Christ is on the wrong side of God. Let
me say that again. Anyone you know who is not a believer in Jesus Christ is on
the wrong side of God. Anyone who rejects Jesus Christ, and who dismisses what
the infallible Word of God says about the need every sinner has to trust Jesus
Christ for the forgiveness of sins, thereby declares himself to not only be
incompetent with respect to spiritual concerns and the hereafter, but he also
shows that no one in his right mind should follow his example or embrace his
influence in that respect. When you are wrong about Jesus Christ, and have not
been reconciled to God, how can you possibly be right about anything that is
truly, eternally, important? I am in no way suggesting that any child should in
any way dishonor or disrespect mother, father, or any other influential person
in his or her life. Neither would I suggest or imply that you in any way
diminish the love that you have for anyone in your life because he or she is
not a Christian. However, I am insisting that you and only you are completely
and utterly responsible in the final analysis for who you allow to influence
you. Of what possible benefit to you is it to allow someone who is on the wrong
side of God to so influence you that you foolishly remain on the wrong side of
God, as well?
That said, three main points for your
consideration:
First, CONSIDER THE REALITY OF GOD
Let me speak to four points related to
the reality of God:
First, there is His certainty. I have
no need to engage in any effort to prove the existence of God. Despite the
protestations of the most virulent atheists, almost no one actually doubts or
questions the existence of God; not in the depths of his heart and soul, at
least. Allow me to illustrate: In Psalm 14.1 we find the declaration,
“The fool hath said in his heart, There
is no God.” If you consider the verse without italics you will notice that
it reads “The fool hath said in his heart, No God.”
Thus is described both the fellow who
is so stupid that he denies God’s existence and also that utter rebel who
denies God’s dominion.[1]
Let me illustrate with two examples: The most famous of all so-called atheists
was Karl Marx, the author of Das Kapital and The Communist
Manifesto. He was the ideological icon behind the Soviet Union under
Lenin and Stalin and the People’s Republic of China under Mao Tse-tung. However,
Richard Wurmbrand, who suffered persecution and torture by the communists for
being a Christian pastor, did extensive study and published a book calling into
question Marx’ atheism. The title of the book is Was Karl Marx An
Atheist? and shows rather from his writings that Marx was a Satanist
rather than an atheist.[2]
If you embrace the reality of Satan you must, therefore, embrace the reality of
God, since even Satanists acknowledge that Satan was himself created by God. Marx
was no atheist, despite what communists say about him. Then there is the famous
community organizer from Chicago who so strongly influenced Hillary Rodham
Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, Saul Alinksy. Interesting to notice is who
his famous book Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic
Radicals is dedicated to; none other than Lucifer the first rebel.[3]
However, once again it must be pointed out that for Lucifer to exist God must
exist because God created Lucifer. Reasonable people recognize the certainty of
God.
Next, there is His creativity. Psalm
19.1 reads,
“The heavens declare the glory of God;
and the firmament sheweth his handywork.”
Thus, the psalmist David insists that
nature attests to the creative activity of God. And who would deny that God is
the creator and sustainer of all things? Karl Marx did not, because he embraced
the notion that God was Satan’s creator. Saul Alinsky did not, because he, too,
embraced the notion that God was Lucifer’s creator (Lucifer being Satan’s
original name). Therefore, at both ends of the spectrum, from the Word of God
and those of us who are devoted to the inspiration, authority, and accuracy of
the Bible, all the way to the other end of the spiritual spectrum with those
who vehemently deny God’s right to rule over His creation, it is implicit in
the beliefs of both ideological opponent groups that God is the Creator.
Third, there is His personality. It is
when you settle on a discussion of the personality of God that the two groups
that are poles apart find their differences irreconcilable. While both those
who fear God and those who hate God are agreed that God is a personal God, possessing
intellect, sensibility, and will, Christians as well as others who embrace the
character and authority of the Bible subscribe to the notion that God is as He
describes Himself in the Bible, a being of highest moral character. There is no
belief by such as Karl Marx or Saul Alinsky that God is not immortal. They will
grant us that. Their contention is that God is not good, that God is not love,
that God is not merciful, and that God is not gracious. They are convinced God
is of low moral character. That is how they justify their rebellious and
defiant attitude toward Him, who they see as mean and hypocritical. In a sense,
the entire human race divides over the accuracy of the Bible with respect to
its description of Almighty God, or should I say God’s description of Himself
in the Bible. Is God good? Is God holy? Is God love? Is God wise?
This brings us to our final point
concerning the reality of God, His morality. I make no apology about being
someone who believes the Bible. I believe that in order for someone to hold an
intellectually tenable position certain assumptions have to be made. The
assumption that I made forty years ago, and the assumption that I continue to
embrace without hesitation today, is that God’s Word is true, and that it
reflects the character of God, Who is also true. Therefore, allow me to read
just a few verses that clearly indicate the morality of God:
·
In
First John 4.7-8 we find the phrases “love is of God” and “God is love.”
·
The
almost 160 verses in which the word “grace” is found show that God is gracious.
·
Jude
25 declares that He is “the only wise God.”
·
First
Corinthians 10.13 declares that “God is faithful.”
·
Revelation
16.5 informs us that God is righteous.
·
Second
Corinthians 1.18 is one of many passages declaring that God is true.
·
In
Titus 1.2 the Apostle Paul insists that God cannot lie.
·
Revelation
4.8 is only one of the verses showing God is the thrice holy God.
Therefore, since God’s Word, the
Bible, is true, John 17.17, it must accurately reflect and declare the nature
of God’s morality. In short, God is moral in the very best sense of the concept
of morality. Thus, it is an inescapable conclusion that if you are on the wrong
side of God you are wrong, and you are only right when you are on the right
side of God because God’s side is the right side.
Next, CONSIDER THE REQUIREMENT OF GOD
It is more than reasonable to suppose
that the Creator of all things would entertain wishes for His creation,
requirements if you will. Consider in three ways the basis for God’s
requirement for those He has created:
First, God’s requirement is based on
His sovereignty. Sovereignty can be defined as,
“The biblical concept of God’s kingly,
supreme rule and legal authority over the entire universe. God’s sovereignty is
expressed, exercised and displayed in the divine plan for and outworking of
salvation history. Divine sovereignty is emphasized especially in the
Augustinian – Calvinist tradition, where it is paradoxically contrasted with
human responsibility.”[4]
One commentator writes, “Only two
alternatives are possible: God must either rule, or be ruled; sway, or be
swayed; accomplish His own will, or be thwarted by His creatures.”[5]
We must ask ourselves if the Bible declares that God will get His way, bring to
pass His divine purpose, and accomplish His purpose and goals. My answer is
that the existence of the Book of Revelation, the capstone of scripture, which
shows what will most assuredly come to pass, establishes beyond any possible
doubt the sovereignty of God in that it shows that God most definitely will
accomplish His eternal purpose and goal. Whatever it is that God requires is
what God will get, because sovereignty means that God will get His way.
Second, God’s requirement is based on
His holiness. Holy is
“A biblical term generally meaning ‘to
be set apart.’ The term is used widely in Scripture to refer to a variety of
people and objects alike but ultimately points to God as the one who is
qualitatively different or set apart from creation. . . In the NT holiness
takes on the sense of ethical purity or freedom from sin. The fullness of the
biblical witness, then, testifies to God’s holiness, understood as God’s
‘otherness’ and ‘purity,’ as well as to God’s prerogative to set people and
things apart for God’s own purposes, together with the resulting godliness in
the lives of those whom God declares to be holy.”[6]
Such passages as Deuteronomy 4.24 and
Hebrews 12.29, which reveal that God is “a consuming fire,” are descriptions of
His holiness. However, there is more to God’s holiness, in that it is an active
attribute and not a passive characteristic. That is, God is not only clean and
absent any sin or impurity, but His nature of holiness is such that He seeks
out that which is defiled to bring to bear His judgment against it. That is why
God’s Word has so much to say about that which is clean versus that which is unclean
and therefore defiled, and the great need for cleansing, especially the
cleansing of the heart and the cleansing away of sin.[7] Thus,
if God’s holiness demands that sinfulness and uncleanness be either cleansed or
punished, and if the means of cleansing is freely available to any who need it,
what toleration should be expected from God when the sinner refuses to be
cleansed?
Finally, God’s requirement is based on
His righteousness. Righteousness is
“An attribute of God’s being; God’s
right and just character, actions and judgments. God’s righteousness as
understood in a covenantal context includes God’s right judgment of both God’s
own people and those who oppress them, as well as God’s salvation and mercy
extended to those to whom the covenant in God has promised to be faithful
righteousness and salvation are summed up in and provided for all those who
believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.”[8]
Illustrating God’s righteousness is
the comment Abraham made to God in Genesis 18.25:
“Shall not the Judge of all the earth
do right?”
Righteousness as an attribute means
that God will always judge rightly and deal rightly, not only with those who
are right and who do right, but also with those who are wrong and who do wrong.
Thus, when God casts the unsaved into the lake of fire after they have appeared
before the Great White Throne, He is doing the right thing and thereby displays
His righteousness. By the same token, when God grants forgiveness full and free
to the repentant sinner who trusts Christ and based upon that is assured of an
eternity in the presence of his glorified Lord, that too is righteous, based as
it is on the saving work of Jesus Christ on the cross of Calvary where God
punished the saved sinner’s sins in the person of his divine Substitute, Jesus
Christ. Righteousness on display once more, this time the result of God’s grace
meted out through faith in Jesus Christ. So you see, it is right and a
righteousness thing for God to demand that sinners turn from their sins to
trust Christ, to treat eternally well those who respond in faith believing, and
to treat eternally harshly those who refuse and who reject the free offer of salvation
in Christ.
Finally, THE REWARD OR THE RECOMPENSE
OF GOD
The reality of God cannot be
questioned by rational men. That there would be a requirement demanded by such
a being, based on His sovereignty, based on His holiness, and based on His righteousness,
is also beyond question. There is a right side of God and a wrong side of God,
and there are all kinds of consequences to either be enjoyed or suffered
depending on which side of God you are on, the right side or the wrong side. If
you are on the right side of God your sins are forgiven, your guilt is all
gone, you have the instruction of the indwelling Holy Spirit and the Bible
available to you, and also access to God’s wisdom. On the other hand, if you
are on the wrong side of God, your sins are not forgiven, your guilt remains,
and you are spiritually lifeless and without the real instruction of God’s
Spirit through God’s Word, leaving you for the most part a complete fool with
respect to spiritual matters, which is to say those matters which are most
important.
That said, my real focus in this
message has to do with the long term eternal consequence of being on the right
side of God or the wrong side of God. I will address the bitter before
addressing the sweet:
Allow me to label the bitter God’s
strange work. I refer to the eternal torment of the damned as God’s strange
work because of what I find in Isaiah 28.21:
“For the LORD shall rise up as in mount
Perazim, he shall be wroth as in the valley of Gibeon, that he may do
his work, his strange work; and bring to pass his act, his strange act.”
To what does this verse refer in which
reference is made to God’s strange work, His strange act? The entire chapter
predicts the fall of Samaria and is a warning to Jerusalem.[9] In
the short term God will use the Assyrians to punish the sins of the Kingdom of
Israel, with the punishment of the Kingdom of Judah and the capital city of
Jerusalem being warned later on, both of them the direct consequence of being
on the wrong side of God. Thus, we see that even with God’s sovereignty,
holiness and righteousness, He does not like or enjoy administering appropriate
consequences to those deserving it. Lamentations 3.33, written while Jerusalem
was under siege by the Babylonians, when starvation and even cannibalism was
rampant, speaks directly to this issue:
“For he doth not afflict willingly nor
grieve the children of men.”
Moving from lesser to greater, let us
consider that which lies beyond God’s punishment of wrongdoing and being on the
wrong side of God in the here and now to a consideration of eternity, after the
man who is on the wrong side of God departs from this life and enters the
eternal state. What will it be like for him? At the end of His Olivet
Discourse, the night before His crucifixion, the Lord Jesus Christ spoke to
what it will be like for those who do not avail themselves of His salvation,
who instead willingly die in unbelief. Matthew 25.41 and 46:
41 Then
shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into
everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
46 And
these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life
eternal.
Numerous other passages reinforce what
we have seen here, unbelievers dying and going to Hell, but then comes
eternity, everlasting fire, and everlasting punishment. Do you really want to
follow the bad example of the most influential person in your life? Is it worth
it to you to prefer the favor of an individual over the favor of God?
I cast my vote for the Savior, and
look forward to benefiting from God’s preferred work. God’s preferred work is
to keep His Word, to fulfill His promises, and to deliver on the salvation
promised to those who cast themselves on the provision of His Son, Jesus
Christ. Philippians 1.6 reads,
“Being confident of this very thing,
that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the
day of Jesus Christ.”
Thus, we can be sure that what God
starts He will finish, with respect to salvation. And what will God finish with
regarding the believer’s salvation? In First John 3.2 the apostle, writing to
assure believers in Jesus Christ, writes,
“Beloved, now are we the sons of God,
and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall
appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.”
Most comforting, however, are the
words the Savior spoke the night before His crucifixion, in John 14.1-3:
1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God,
believe also in me.
2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were
not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.
3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come
again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be
also.
So you see, those who are the right
side of God, who came to be on the right side of God when they turned from
their sins and trusted Jesus Christ as their personal savior will be blessed by
God’s preferred work, while those who pass into eternity as Christ rejecters
will suffer from God’s strange work.
Let me urge you to carefully consider
where you are, on the wrong side of God. Consider also that you will remain on
the wrong side of God unless you selectively choose to restrict the influence
on the direction of your life you allow others to have, even if those others
are your father, your mother, your brothers and sisters, or some other admired
person. It is a glorious thing if you can follow the example of your father and
become a Christian like him. However, if most men in our church had followed their
father’s lead in that respect they would not be the Christian men they are
today. At some point you have to make a decision regarding the influence others
have in your life. At some point, like these men and others I have mentioned,
you have to strike out on your own and obey the gospel, or you will spend all
eternity suffering regret and torment of the soul. You don’t want to be on the
wrong side of God.
[1] Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry’s Commentary On
The Whole Bible, (Bronson, MI: Online Publishing, Inc., 2002),
bible@mail.com
[2] Richard Wurmbrand, Was Karl Marx A Satanist?
(Glendale, CA: Diane Books, 1978, Revised Edition)
[3] Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic
Primer for Realistic Radicals (1971) Random House, ISBN 0-394-44341-1;
Vintage books paperback: ISBN 0-679-72113-4
[4] Stanley J. Grenz, David Guretzki & Cherith Fee
Nordling, Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, (Downers Grove,
IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999), page 109.
[5] Arthur Pink, The Sovereignty Of God,
(Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, Sixth Edition, 1959), page 17.
[6] Grenz, page 60.
[7] Psalm 51.7, 10; 1 John 1.7; Revelation 1.5
[8] Grenz, page 103.
[9] Hobart E. Freeman, An Introduction To The Old
Testament Prophets, (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1968), page 213.
Would you like to contact Dr. Waldrip about this sermon? Fill out the form below to send him an email. Thank you.