“CONFIRMATION”
This morning I want to speak to you
about the subject of confirmation, but not the Roman Catholic Church kind of
confirmation. I do want, as we approach Christmas, to address the tendency of
so many people to think that faith is some kind of blind or baseless
conviction. Perhaps you have heard the phrase “blind faith,” or you have heard
of Søren Kierkegaard’s notion of “the leap of faith.”[1] “A
leap of faith, in its most commonly used meaning, is the act of believing in or
accepting something intangible or unprovable, or without empirical evidence.”[2]
I’m here to tell you that that notion of faith is foreign to the Bible. From
Hebrews 11.1 we read, “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the
evidence of things not seen.” Taking into consideration the Greek word
translated “substance” and the Greek word translated “evidence,” the former referring
to a “title deed” (which is proof of ownership) and the later referring to
“proof” useful in a court of law, it is very clear that the writer of the
letter to the Hebrews would consider the notion that faith is blind to be
completely foreign to his understanding of the term.[3]
Differing greatly from what unsaved
people think is our view of faith, we recognize that faith as it is referred to
in the Bible has for its basis historical fact. This recognition of the true
nature of faith is verifiable once it is understood what the Greek word
translated “evidence” and the Greek word translated “substance” actually mean. Of
interest to those who want to discover and know the truth (and useful to us
later in this sermon) is a quote from Simon Greenleaf, one of the founders of
the Harvard School of Law:
“A proposition of fact is proved, when
its truth is established by competent and satisfactory evidence.”[4]
That is the basis for every real
Christian’s faith. Additional to this is the well-established but almost
completely ignored biblical principle of two or three witnesses. Which is to
say, from Genesis to Revelation and throughout the Bible in between truth is
authenticated, matters of fact are verified, and the rules of evidence used by
courts descended from English Common Law that were themselves influenced by the
Bible, require fact to be established by two or three independent testimonies. Legal
expert Greenleaf also writes, “According to Hebrew text one (emphasis in
the original) witness is no witness; there must be at least two or three who
know the fact.”[5]
Allow me to convince you by reading and quickly commenting on twenty-seven
passages in the Old and New Testaments that this principle of two or three
witnesses is foundational to Biblical truth:
Numbers
35.30: “Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the
mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person to
cause him to die.”
Establishing by only one witness the
guilt of those accused of murder was forbidden.
Deuteronomy
17.6-7: 6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall
he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one
witness he shall not be put to death.
7 The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put
him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So thou shalt put the
evil away from among you.
Verification of the fact of guilt
requires at least two witnesses.
Joshua
24.22: “And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against
yourselves that ye have chosen you the LORD,
to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses.”
Multiple corroboration of fact was
employed in this verse by Joshua.
Ruth
4.9-11: 9 And Boaz said unto the elders, and unto all the
people, Ye are witnesses this day, that I have bought all that was
Elimelech’s, and all that was Chilion’s and Mahlon’s, of the hand of Naomi.
10 Moreover
Ruth the Moabitess, the wife of Mahlon, have I purchased to be my wife, to
raise up the name of the dead upon his inheritance, that the name of the dead
be not cut off from among his brethren, and from the gate of his place: ye are
witnesses this day.
11 And
all the people that were in the gate, and the elders, said, We are
witnesses. The LORD make the woman that is come into
thine house like Rachel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel:
and do thou worthily in Ephratah, and be famous in Bethlehem.
Boaz made use of multiple witnesses to
establish his performance as a kinsman-redeemer in compliance with the Law of
Moses.
Job
10.17: “Thou renewest thy witnesses
against me, and increasest thine indignation upon me; changes and war are
against me.”
The patriarch Job acknowledges the
principle of multiple witnesses as a principle to establish a basis of fact.
Isaiah
8.2: “And I took unto me faithful
witnesses to record, Uriah the priest, and Zechariah the son of Jeberechiah.”
When obeying the LORD’s instructions the prophet Isaiah
took faithful witnesses to verify his obedience.
Isaiah
43.9-12: 9 Let all the nations be gathered together, and let the
people be assembled: who among them can declare this, and shew us former
things? let them bring forth their witnesses, that they may be justified: or
let them hear, and say, It is truth.
10 Ye
are my witnesses, saith the LORD,
and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and
understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither
shall there be after me.
11 I,
even I, am the LORD;
and beside me there is no saviour.
12 I
have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no
strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, that I am God.
Here we see that even God employs
witnesses to verify to the Gentile nations that He is the one true and living
God.
Isaiah
44.8-9: 8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from
that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is
there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
9 They that make a graven image are all of them
vanity; and their delectable things shall not profit; and they are their
own witnesses; they see not, nor know; that they may be ashamed.
Here it is pointed out that the Jewish
people attest to God’s uniqueness and the pagans attest to the fact that their
own gods are not real. In both instances there is multiple witnesses
verification of fact.
Jeremiah 32.10, 12, 25, 44: 10 And I
subscribed the evidence, and sealed it, and took witnesses, and weighed him
the money in the balances.
12 And
I gave the evidence of the purchase unto Baruch the son of Neriah, the son of
Maaseiah, in the sight of Hanameel mine uncle’s son, and in the presence
of the witnesses that subscribed the book of the purchase, before all the Jews
that sat in the court of the prison.
25 And
thou hast said unto me, O Lord GOD,
Buy thee the field for money, and take witnesses; for the city is given into
the hand of the Chaldeans.
44 Men
shall buy fields for money, and subscribe evidences, and seal them, and
take witnesses in the land of Benjamin, and in the places about Jerusalem, and
in the cities of Judah, and in the cities of the mountains, and in the cities
of the valley, and in the cities of the south: for I will cause their captivity
to return, saith the LORD.
Though the prophetical implications
here are profound, my purpose at present is to show that these verses record
real estate transactions that are verified by written evidence and witnesses of
the transaction to establish the authenticity of the real estate transfer. In
our day this role is performed in many cases by a Notary Public and by
witnesses who affix their signatures to the appropriate document.
Matthew 18.15-20: 15 Moreover if thy brother shall
trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if
he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
16 But
if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more,
that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
17 And
if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he
neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a
publican.
18 Verily
I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and
whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
19 Again
I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing
that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.
20 For
where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of
them.
This passage is familiar to us just as
the principle contained in it was very familiar to the Lord’s apostles. Multiple
witnesses are required to establish matters of fact related to church
discipline and reconciliation.
Luke
24.46-48: 46 And said unto them, Thus
it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead
the third day:
47 And
that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all
nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 And
ye are witnesses of these things.
These two men the risen Savior was
speaking to are identified by Him as witnesses to the fact that He stands
before them having been raised from the dead as was predicted.
Acts
1.8: “But ye shall receive power, after
that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in
Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of
the earth.”
How many was our risen Lord then
speaking to? About 120 men and women are identified as witnesses.
Acts
2.32: “This Jesus hath God raised up,
whereof we all are witnesses.”
Speaking to thousands on the Day of
Pentecost, Peter is here referring to himself and the 120 who stood with him as
witnesses to Christ’s resurrection from the dead.
Acts
3.15: “And killed the Prince of life,
whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses.”
On this occasion Simon Peter refers to
himself and the Apostle John as witnesses.
Acts
5.32: “And we are his witnesses of
these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them
that obey him.”
Verses 26-27 reveal that Simon Peter
and some other apostles had been arrested for preaching, and that Peter and the
others are the witnesses he in verse 32 refers to, including the Holy Spirit
who brings conviction to the sinner’s hearts that what these men speak is true.
Acts
10.39-40: 39 And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the
land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree:
40 Him
God raised up the third day, and shewed him openly.
The witnesses Peter refers to in verse
39 were the companions (plural) he brought with him from Joppa, who were
mentioned in verse 23.
Acts
13.31: “And he was seen many days of them
which came up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who are his witnesses unto
the people.”
In this verse the Apostle Paul refers
to our Lord’s disciples during His earthly ministry who are the witnesses to
His resurrection here referred to.
First
Corinthians 15.4-8: 4 And that he was buried, and
that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at
once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen
asleep.
7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the
apostles.
8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born
out of due time.
Is this not corroboration? Hundreds
bearing witness to the truth.
Second
Corinthians 13.1: “This is the third time
I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be
established.”
Here the Apostle Paul refers to the
Old Testament principle of two or three witnesses.[6] Clearly
the Old Testament principle is shown by Paul to be applicable even after
Christ’s crucifixion.
First
Thessalonians 2.10: “Ye are witnesses, and God also, how holily and justly and
unblameably we behaved ourselves among you that believe.”
The congregation, as well as God, are
witnesses to the facts Paul addresses.
First
Timothy 5.19: “Against an elder receive
not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.”
Multiple attestation by witnesses to
events are required in the Old Testament, are shown by the Savior to be
required in the New Testament congregation, and is shown as well in this verse.
One person alone is not authorized to make a public accusation against a church
leader.
First
Timothy 6.12: “Fight the good fight of
faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast
professed a good profession before many witnesses.”
Paul observes that many people could
be called on to verify Timothy’s lifestyle and fidelity to the truth.
Hebrews
10.28: “He that despised Moses’ law
died without mercy under two or three witnesses.”
No comment needed at this point.
First
John 4.1: “Beloved, believe not every
spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false
prophets are gone out into the world.”
Do not take the say-so of any spirit,
but try (or test) the spirits to see if they are of God. How can the true from
the false be discerned, but by multiple witnesses of fact?
First
John 5.7-9: 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the
Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the
Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.[7]
9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is
greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.
Even in heaven the principle of
multiple witnesses of fact is appropriate. Even the Triune Godhead conducts His
affairs in accordance with this principle.
Revelation
1.1: “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his
servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it
by his angel unto his servant John.”
What is overlooked by all of the
commentators I have consulted is the indication that the revelation of Jesus
Christ was “signified” to John by the angel who delivered it to him. The angel
engaged in some activity, or provided some evidentiary proof to John, that the
message he conveyed was authentic. Of course, this establishes what the other
passages I have read so far show, that verification of truth or fact is
absolutely required to ascertain that truth. Being a Jewish believer,
well-schooled in scripture and having sat at the feet of the Savior, John would
not have received any message from anyone as being true unless it was in some
profoundly convincing way verified, attested to by two or three witnesses to
the fact.
Revelation
2.2: “I know thy works, and thy
labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and
thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found
them liars.”
Here the Savior commends the church in
Ephesus for trying them which say they are apostles, but were not. Of
course, they did this by refusing to act upon any information they could not
independently verify by means of multiple trustworthy witnesses.
Would to God those of Pentecostal or
Charismatic persuasion would do likewise with respect to those who claim to be
prophets, or to have the word of knowledge, and whatever other gibberish they
pretend is true. However, before you think too much of those of us who are
Baptists, we are just as guilty as the word of faith and gift of tongues
Arminians, though with respect to different topics than the gift of tongues,
losing one’s salvation, and a radical misunderstanding of what constitutes real
worship of God. Our tendency is to believe unverified gossip, which happens
whenever you abandon the principle of two or three witnesses.
What I propose to quickly pass by you
this morning, and to provide proof of with abundant footnotes in this sermon’s
manuscript online for later additional study, is an assertion that not only is
faith not blind but that faith, real faith, saving faith, Bible faith, must
have for its proper underlying basis real confirmation. I am not suggesting the
Holy Spirit is absent in this confirmation, but honestly believe that sinful
man is so depraved and newly converted Christians are so ignorant that the
Spirit of God produces confidence in the truth found in God’s Word even before
confirmation of the truth is actually known by reliable means. Just know this. Confirmation
of the truth has always been the factual basis upon which real faith is firmly settled,
like a strong foundation is settled on solid bedrock. We who are Christians
should have no inclination to accept as true or to believe anything for which
there is not, or at least at one point in time there was, confirmation.
Thus, it is not a lack of faith that
demands evidence, but a presence of faith that demands evidence, because real
faith is built on evidence. Three points to convince you of this assertion:
First, THE PRINCIPLE
The principle is that two or three
witnesses seem to always have been required by God in heaven, and by God on
earth in His dealings with men, and even in men’s dealings with other men. This
does not mean that one must treat every individual who speaks to you as a
potential liar, but it does mean that human beings are profoundly flawed and
fallible creatures, capable of not only sinful misconstruance of the facts in
the form of lies and deception, but also capable of mistakes being made by the
most honest and sincere of individuals, be they speaking what they think is the
truth, or observing what they think is taking place, or receiving the testimony
of another fallible person.
This is why, when you are doing
business with your friends, when you are doing business with strangers, when
you are engaged with your children, or whatever you are doing that involves
exchanging information or in any way relies upon facts, history, or the truth,
make sure you seek corroboration of the facts. Truthful people are not offended
by those who seek corroboration, but are comforted by those who seek
corroboration.
You might be thinking right now, “But
faith requires a willingness to fly in the face of facts!” Not really. Faith in
God, in God’s Word, and faith in Christ may very well require a willingness to
fly in the face of what appear to be facts, or in the face only
of facts that reflect what can be seen, but when the situation is properly
understood, or when there is consideration of things not seen, it is another
thing altogether.
Real faith involves a willingness to
accept God’s sure testimony of truth over against what may initially seem to be
well-attested facts held to be true by men. However, faith clings to the
certainty that God is always true and has always shown Himself to be true,
while man has very frequently shown himself to be mistaken about almost
everything. This is the reality that lies back of Romans 3.4, where Paul
writes, “let God be true, but every man a liar.”
Next, THE PARTICULARS
I assert that God does not as a
general rule demand or expect His creatures to accept as true anything that He
is not willing to corroborate by some means. Here are some examples:
Abraham.
Abraham was called by
God from Ur of the Chaldees to journey to a place he did not know. If you are
like me as a young Christian you probably surmised that God spoke, Abraham
listened, and then Abraham acted solely on what he heard. Wrong. To be sure,
God spoke. However, God also showed His glory to corroborate what He said to
Abram.[8]
Moses.
Remember Moses and
the burning bush? The burning bush that was not consumed whilst it burned, and
also the spoken word of God, provided two evidences upon which Moses was
authorized to act.[9]
Pharaoh.
Why should Pharaoh
have listened to the words of Moses to let the Israelites go? Based on the
testimony of Moses, Pharaoh had no obligation to comply. However, the testimony
of Moses was confirmed by ten plagues that authenticated his claim to be
speaking for the LORD. Thus, Pharaoh and his people
suffered the consequences of lives lost for not heeding the words of Moses.[10]
Belshazzar.
Remember the drunken
Babylonian king who saw the terrifying handwriting on the wall? What did he do
but verify both the source and the message of that miracle by seeking the aged
prophet Daniel to both confirm and to interpret God’s message of judgment and
condemnation to him. Belshazzar did not respond to this authenticated message
from God demanding repentance, and that very night he was slain by the invading
Medes and Persians.[11]
The
Virgin Mary. Remember
reading about the angel Gabriel’s visit to her, informing her that God had
chosen her to bear the Christ child? Consider the attestations Mary had to work
with: An angel appeared to her and spoke, his words were confirmed by her
virginal pregnancy, by the reaction of her cousin Elizabeth who was pregnant
with John the Baptist, by the response of Joseph to the same angel Gabriel
speaking to him, and by the visit of both the shepherds responding to the
angels on the night of the Savior’s birth and the arrival of the wise men from
the East that took place later.[12]
These were not coincidences, people. They were divine verifications of fact.
The
Shepherds near Bethlehem.
We cannot ignore those who were keeping watch over their flocks by night. There
were three corroborations available to them: First, the appearance of
the angel and the glory of the Lord that shined all around them. Second,
a multitude of the “heavenly host appeared praising God, and saying, Glory to
God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” Finally,
when they went to Bethlehem they discovered that everything was as they had
been told it would be.[13]
How
about the wise men from the East?
The magi from Babylon (where the Jewish people had been during the captivity)
had the Hebrew scriptures containing the prophet Daniel’s prediction of
Christ’s arrival on the scene and the prophet Isaiah’s identification of Him as
being born of a virgin. Then they had the supernaturally appearing and
reappearing star that guided them to their final destination.[14]
Two witnesses of fact were found in God’s Word, and then there was that star.
The
apostles of Jesus Christ.
What kind of verification was available to those men? The raising of Jairus’
daughter? Casting out demons? Feeding thousands with but little food? Walking
on the water? Raising Lazarus? Healing the man with the withered hand? Curing
the centurion’s sick servant at a distance? The voice of divine approval? Seeing
Christ in His glory? How about seeing Christ raised from the dead?[15]
Too many things to keep track of, really.[16]
Finally,
what about you? To be
sure, we have recorded in God’s Word these and many other multiple attestations
of fact upon which to provide a foundation for faith. I mentioned eight
examples and could have rehearsed many more, but the pattern in their lives
only illustrates the principle already rehearsed to you; that two or three
witnesses are essential, and that two or three witnesses are provided by God,
as a foundation for faith. Just a
reminder. Cain obviously had a foundation for faith though he was a rejecter,
Belshazzar had a foundation for belief but he was a refuser, Herod had
witnesses to facts for faith in the persons of the wise men but he refused to
believe, so there is ample evidence of those who reject ample evidence. Will you be such a person? You might
ask, “What witnesses to facts for faith do I have access to?” First, you
have the universal testimony of nature, Psalm 19.1-3:
1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament
sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night
sheweth knowledge.
3 There is
no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
You also have the testimony of
God’s Word. In John 17.17 the Lord Jesus Christ declared to His heavenly
Father,
“Thy word is truth.”
And, third, you have the
testimony of credible Christians. Thus, you have all the necessary ingredients
upon which to establish a foundation for faith to rest upon. There is no
justifiable reason for claiming that you cannot believe the gospel. You
can . . . if you will.
Finally, THE POINT
The point is you have a sinful nature
that stands in open rebellion against God, sometimes rebelling against even the
very thought of God. There are multiple witnesses to that fact in your conduct.
The point is also that God saw your need and sent His only begotten Son, Who
suffered, bled, and died on the cross for your sins, and then rose from the
dead. There are multiple witnesses to that fact, as well.
As we approach Christmas time this
year, as in other years, the great majority of those who celebrate Christmas
think it’s a very nice tradition, it’s wonderful for little kids, but it really
has no basis in fact; there is nothing to really hang your faith on. Oh, how
very wrong such thinking is. Faith is not wishful thinking. Faith is not
sentimentalism. Faith is not clinging to unsubstantiated convictions. Everywhere
in the Bible and throughout the Christian faith that rests upon the bedrock
certainty of God’s Word, faith is shown to be the right conclusions about God
and His Son that are drawn from evidence, and from proof, and from performance.
Sadly, the sinner’s mind is so
darkened that apart from the Holy Spirit’s intervention no one will actually
believe the truth, even when it stares him in the face.[17] Even
so, we have great reasons for believing God, for trusting the reliability of
God’s Word, and for believing that His future dealings with us will be just as
trustworthy and beneficial as all His deeds in the past have been.
The point then of this sermon? We have
confirmation. We have confirmation that God is real, that God is good, that God
is true, and Jesus Christ saves those who trust Him, and that Christmas should
be the intelligent and reasoned response to events that we can prove happened. Christmas,
and everything else that comprises the Christian faith, is substantiated by
real history, by credible witnesses to fact, and God always deals with
human beings on the basis of challenging us to believe Him, to trust Him, based
upon verified and verifiable facts. That, my friends, is confirmation.
[2] Dictionary.com definition of leap of faith
[3] Bauer, Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon of the
New Testament and other Early Christian Literature, (Chicago, IL: The
University of Chicago Press, 2000), pages 1040-1041 and 315.
[4] Simon Greenleaf, The Testimony Of The
Evangelists: The Gospels Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in
Courts of Justice, (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Classics, 1995 reprint),
page 28. Greenleaf’s three-volume work, A Treatise on the Law of Evidence,
is considered a classic of American jurisprudence and forms the basis for his
study of the Gospels.
[5] Ibid., page 90.
[6] G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson, Commentary On The
New Testament Use Of The Old Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker
Academic, 2007), pages 780-782.
[7] The most thorough discussion of First John 5.7-8 I
have ever seen is found in Alan J. Macgregor, 400 Years On: How does the
Authorized Version stand up in the 21st Century? (UK: Vision
Solutionsni, 2010), pages 147-182.
[8] Acts 7.2-4
[9] Exodus 3.2-6
[10] Exodus 5.1-2; 6.1; 7.8-13, 20; 8.6, 17, 24; 9.6, 10,
14, 23; 10.13, 22; 12.12; 13.15
[11] Daniel 5.1-31
[12] Luke 1.26-38, 39-44; Matthew 1.18-24; Luke 2.8-19;
Matthew 2.1-11
[13] Luke 2.8-16
[14] Isaiah 7.14; Daniel 9.24-27; Matthew 2.1-11
[15] Matthew 3.17; 8.1-13; 12.1-13; 14.21, 25; 15.38; Mark
9.1-7; Luke 8.26-36; 51-56; John 11.1-44; 1 Corinthians 15.4-9
[16] John 21.25
[17] 1 Corinthians 2.14; 2 Corinthians 4.13
Would you like to contact Dr. Waldrip about this sermon? Fill out the form below to send him an email. Thank you.